(1) Many people think Email is like a memo, NO, email is a legal document. If you believe your email is company-wide confidential, choose option: High Importance. (2) Your employer takes legal responsibility, not you, for work issue. (3) ....Important! -> Talk before Write.
Do you do anything important? Talk to your people first, then make judgement whether or not write it down in a piece of email. Government requests that for any company, emails must be archived for ten years for any auditing or legal jurisdictional purpose, for instance: FRCP ( Federal Rules of Civil Procedure )
-nicetomeetyou(老兵新传);
2007-11-8{348}(#4045472@0)
亏你还号称在MS混过，居然说得出 -- If you believe your email is company-wide confidential, choose option: High Importance -- 这种话.......
-mmbug(靡靡虫);
2007-11-8(#4045851@0)
Well, 不知道P.Eng的Code of professional ethics怎么写, 但会计师协会确实有类似规定, 不能随便review, 质疑其他持牌会计师的工作, 不能损害其他会员声誉. 他确实有权利向协会投诉你的. 同专业协会发生纠纷和惹官司一样麻烦, 以后措辞还是小心一点吧.- not act maliciously or in any other way which may adversely reflect on the public or professional reputation or business of another Member
-7y7(醉里吴音);
2007-11-8{140}(#4045474@0)
没看懂这句话，adversely reflect on the public or professional reputation 这里的reflect应该是affect，还是什么？
-geoguy(downtime);
2007-11-8(#4045535@0)
说句老实话，你的同事做的不地道,以后你要小心。内部的email应该被认为是informal and confidential, should not be forwarded to outside world without any examination or investigation.
-nicetomeetyou(老兵新传);
2007-11-8(#4046138@0)
You faced a typical dilemma situation. Based on Code of Ethics 77. 7: (i) act towards other practitioners with courtesy and good faith. (iii) not maliciously injure the reputation or business of another practitioner, your words sounds not adequate.However, based on same requirement 77. 3: A practitioner shall act in professional engineering matters for each employer as a faithful agent or trustee...your actions sounds reasonable, If I were you, I'd rather send a more euphemistical email to address my thought 。。。
-noproblem(。o O);
2007-11-8{273}(#4045864@0)