network operations or programming? the fun part was in the former, which ended its golden time in early 2000 anyways :)
-f1amingo(flamingo);
2006-8-21(#3156683@0)
Agree on chg mgmt ctrl. however the extent of the control depends on 公司的性质和年代。whether control or efficiency, it all boils down to business mandates.
-f1amingo(flamingo);
2006-8-31(#3178969@0)
Info Security科班 is only 5 years max, so u didn't waste much (at least not as much as i did - i am not 科班出身;)). thx for ur advice :-)
-f1amingo(flamingo);
2006-8-31(#3178977@0)
Good experience.珍惜吧。 我在国内时，在一US大公司做网络，是负责整个亚太地区(包括澳大力亚)１０+国家和地区的网络 with over 200 routers.主要是主干网 support and new project implementation. 各国家／site network team supports their campus network unless they need our support . That was really my valuable experience .
-ccz(高山流水);
2006-8-30{180}(#3178291@0)
I agree that enterprise networks are different from ISPs. Large enterprise backbones focus on WAN architecture, routing design and implementation. The routing protocol was EIGRP in the environment I mentioned above,and now we are using OSPF in my current company. ISPs, on the other hand, use BGP in most cases, and provide more other services, like mail, DNS, etc. Good luck, you are good.
-ccz(高山流水);
2006-8-31{177}(#3179197@0)
I worked with Allstream (then AT&T Canada) right after UUNet, only for 6 months. Yes Enterprise networks mostly run OSPF and sometimes even the older EIGRP.At the time I had to deal with a complicated merged network of mixed EIGRP and OSPF. It was horrible. I could see telco techies were not as good at all in routing stuff. ;) Once I had to help a "senior" guy MANUALLY configure a static route to make an EIGRP-routed subnet work in an OSPF environment.
I got tired of helping all the senior AT&T folks all the time, that's why I moved on to a consulting firm after 6 months. ;D
Good to know you, dude. Good luck to you too and, keep in touch.
-f1amingo(flamingo);
2006-8-31{503}(#3179572@0)
telecommunication is different from network engineering
-coolj(酷不起来);
2006-8-31(#3179636@0)
hehe, am I not talking about data networking within telcos? ;)
-f1amingo(flamingo);
2006-8-31(#3179742@0)
weren't you? what were you refering to then?
-coolj(酷不起来);
2006-8-31(#3180086@0)
sorry man. have a nice weekend.
-f1amingo(flamingo);
2006-9-1(#3182826@0)
you too. enjoy your weekend.
-coolj(酷不起来);
2006-9-1(#3182840@0)
it's better to redistribute and tag the eigrp route into ospf rather than statically point to the eigrp network
-coolj(酷不起来);
2006-8-31(#3180111@0)
EIGRP ? who still use it ? Who had used it might be fooled by cisco's trick.
-iambigcat(cat);
2006-8-31(#3180212@0)
okay, other than it's cisco's proprietary. tell me what are the disadvantages. suppose you are a ospf fan, then tell me why you are preferring ospf than eigrp?
-coolj(酷不起来);
2006-8-31(#3180234@0)
I won't waste my time touch eigrp. if ospf, is-is, eigrp all can do same thing, why would you pick up a proprietary protocol ? This is a basic logic flaw.You network won't expending any more ? Don't want implement new features such as mpls ? I guess cisco itself might have stopped develop eigrp
-iambigcat(cat);
2006-8-31{144}(#3181024@0)
yup. eigrp is phased out.
-f1amingo(flamingo);
2006-9-1(#3181361@0)
eigrp is phased out? are you sure?
-coolj(酷不起来);
2006-9-1(#3182634@0)
that's my view, trust it or not ;)
-f1amingo(flamingo);
2006-9-1(#3182790@0)
u got it ;) good to see you and a few other networking folks here!!! -- that's excellent, making me feel 后继有银哪！哈哈
-f1amingo(flamingo);
2006-9-1(#3183575@0)
"MANUALLY configure a static route"?难道还有automatically/dynamically 的 static？：）just kidding. very valuable experience indeed.
-rodgerxu(rodgerxu);
2006-9-1{47}(#3181566@0)
manually means typing the command, versus using a GUI tool. (dynamic is only opposite to static though :)).
-f1amingo(flamingo);
2006-9-1(#3182793@0)