"you are 100% at fault, the black guy 50% at fault, the indian 0% at fault." I forget where i saw this, but i do remember it.
-iwonder(Go Deeper);
2004-6-16(#1767618@0)
same as me everything,same place,same acura,LD went back; the only one is that acura lost my information in that afternoon, so i am luck.
-chinadragon(龙行CONCORDIA);
2004-6-16{115}(#1767662@0)
yeah. Whenever he talked about it, he would add: "am I that old?". pretty funny.
-lusi(丑小鸭);
2004-6-17(#1768052@0)
if you stopped, and other car behind you pushed you forward into car before, you are 0% at fault, car behind you 100% at fault. If you were moving, and got push into car before you, you are 50% at fault.
-chl(chl);
2004-6-17(#1768088@0)
yes, what you said makes sense. that's why my colleague is still upset about it. maybe the insurance company improved in the past 20 years. ;)
-lusi(丑小鸭);
2004-6-17(#1768420@0)
as all the above says, I also think BMW insurance should take care of it, no matter whether Acura has valid insurance or not.
-lusi(丑小鸭);
2004-6-17(#1768059@0)
if B is only 50 percent at fault, who will be responsible for another 50 percent, I really don't understand what they said(a) in the collision between automobiles "A" and "B", the driver of automobile "A" is not at fault and the driver of automobile "B" is 50 per cent at fault for the incident;
-sundell(天道酬勤);
2004-6-21{181}(#1773676@0)
not really. He won't get anything from his ins. company, but he can hire a lawyer and sue you. Your ins. company will pay him if he win.
-apuma(apuma);
2004-6-20(#1772305@0)
He will be waiting the fine from police.
-cuc3(望东方);
2004-6-20(#1772342@0)