真会给GCD脸上贴金唱赞歌啊. 学一点哲学和历史吧. 无知不可怕, 只要肯学. The word dialectic originated in ancient Greece, and was made popular by Plato in the Socratic dialogues.
-thornthorn($oOHoly MolyOo$);
2013-1-6(#7985479@0)
Engels' laws of dialectics: The law of the unity and conflict of opposites; The law of the passage of quantitative changes into qualitative changes; The law of the negation of the negationIf the law of the unity and struggle of opposites discloses the source of development, and the law of the transition of quantitative changes into qualitative changes reveals the mechanism of development, the law of the negation of the negation expresses the direction, form, and result of development.
Quoted from Wiki.
-whynot108(练修养的牛);
2013-1-7{322}(#7987170@0)
"辩证法是对形式逻辑的瓦解,是反科学的。我们长期批形而上学,但我认为科学尤其是理论科学恰恰是从形而上学发展而来。好象逻辑学家牟宗三先生也说过“唯物辩证法”是不通的说法,是在《理则学》中。这就是土共60多年洗脑国人的理论体系的根基和赖以生存的基础."So he was talking about dialectics. Or he did not know what he is talking about.
-whynot108(练修养的牛);
2013-1-7{80}(#7987318@0)
This is his second post "辩证法是对形式逻辑的瓦解,是反科学的。我们长期批形而上学,但我认为科学尤其是理论科学恰恰是从形而上学发展而来。好象逻辑学家牟宗三先生也说过“唯物辩证法”是不通的说法,是在《理则学》中..."Did you think "辩证法" in his original post was the same one as in his second post? His second post was talking about dialectics.
-whynot108(练修养的牛);
2013-1-8{132}(#7987364@0)
The start point of this trail is here "完完全全的诡辩之术,连辩证法究竟是什么都不知道,也敢瞎说一气。" Read through the following posts and hope you could get your mind straight.
-whynot108(练修养的牛);
2013-1-8(#7987372@0)
I think you should get your mind straight first. How can you say "完完全全的诡辩之术,连辩证法究竟是什么都不知道,也敢瞎说一气"?
-lafeit(lafeit);
2013-1-8(#7987380@0)
You asked "何不说说你所知道的“辩证法”?"
-whynot108(练修养的牛);
2013-1-8(#7987384@0)
I provided you "Engels' laws of dialectics".
-whynot108(练修养的牛);
2013-1-8(#7987386@0)
Then you argued "此辩证法不同于彼辩证法,看看楼主批判的“辩证法”有哪一条符合你这里的dialectics?"
-whynot108(练修养的牛);
2013-1-8(#7987387@0)
Then I pointed you out his second post""辩证法是对形式逻辑的瓦解,是反科学的。我们长期批形而上学,但我认为科学尤其是理论科学恰恰是从形而上学发展而来。好象逻辑学家牟宗三先生也说过“唯物辩证法”是不通的说法,是在《理则学》中..." was talking about dialectics.
-whynot108(练修养的牛);
2013-1-8{221}(#7987389@0)
So what? How did you prove the author "完完全全的诡辩之术,连辩证法究竟是什么都不知道,也敢瞎说一气" here? Nothing!
-lafeit(lafeit);
2013-1-8(#7987399@0)