:
Loading...
:
说了任何人不爱听的话即“有害”的言论，都可能犯法。这等于说，你发表任何言论都可能让你犯法，因为总会有人不喜欢。古往今来，只有你冒犯了权贵才会“犯法”，说了普通男人、女人、老人、残疾人等等不爱听的话，不会被官家惩罚。
说真话也会受到惩罚，只要有人不爱听。加拿大高法说过，truth is not the defence（真理不能用作挡箭牌），只要有人不喜欢，说的是事实也可以算hate crime仇恨犯罪，比如“华人炒菜油烟大”。。。
说了其他人不爱听的话，可判终身监禁，比如说了“华人炒菜油烟大”。
如果有人认为你可能发表“有害言论”但还没有发表，都可以先惩罚你，比如禁止出门上网甚至先关你入狱。称这个法案是文字狱都算涂脂抹粉，文字狱好歹有文字作证据（证据对不对不讨论），即你先发表了“有害言论”，官家再惩罚你；而智忧党法案可以在你并没有发表“有害言论”时，惩罚你。
古往今来，保持沉默就不会祸从口出，到了智忧党时代，张口闭口都是祸！
Bill-63是个大杂烩，定罪网上的有害/仇恨内容/言论，包括儿童色情（有现成法律）、反犹、和一切令人不快的帖子。如果你反对这个法案，智忧党就指责你不顾儿童的安危。打个比喻，智忧党用鸡丁、辣椒、砒霜做了一道菜，你不肯动筷子，就指责你嘴叼连宫爆鸡丁都不吃。
而且，不管人民生命安全不肯打击犯罪的智忧党，会关心儿童的安危？更不用说教唆小孩割鸡鸡当太监了。
文字狱威胁的不仅仅是敌人，也是自己，即独裁暴政文字狱的支持者，在西方就是那些左左，任何一句不经意的话，比如“今天天气很好”，都可能“犯法”。（为啥？当个小测验）
:
:
中国古代历史上曾出现过几次告密之风盛行的时期，如商鞅变法后的秦国、汉武帝时代、武则天时代、朱元璋时代以及所谓的“康雍乾盛世”时期。每一次兴起，都弄得民风败恶，诚信沦丧。
读过中国历史的人都应该隐约感到其中的危害。
If this bill-63 passes, I, a Chinese immigrant, would immigrate back to China, because China would be more tolerate of free speech than Canada. Here are a few examples of comparison;
1. China would not jail you for life for what you say on line. Canada would.
2. China always blocks or deletes your posts/accounts first, warn you next, not immediately take you to court/prison. And no cash rewards for someone to report your “crime”. Canada would immediately put you on trial and award the complainant $25000 CAD.
3. China would not jail you for saying something “hateful/harmful” to anyone such as man/woman/ LGBT/seniors and etc, as long as it is not “harmful” to the Party. Canada would jail you for saying anything anyone thought was “hateful/harmful” to them.
4. China would not punish you if you were not saying anything “hateful/harmful”. Chinese are safe if they are just shut up. Canada would if someone thought you might say something “hateful/harmful” in future but you haven’t said it. Canadians would not be safe even they were shut up.
Loading...