我一个个回答你 -uws(United We Stand) @埃德蒙顿华人论坛:埃德蒙顿枫下论坛 The Rolia Forum of Edmonton

我一个个回答你

uws(United We Stand)

美/越南战争:

北越首先进攻: Viet Cong initiated a war against South Vietnam.

美/阿富汗战争:

It's a result of the 9-11 attack.

“美/利比亚战争”:

On 19 March 2011, a multi-state NATO-led coalition began a military intervention in Libya to implement United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973 (UNSCR 1973), in response to events during the 2011 Libyan civil war. With ten votes in favour and five abstentions, the UN Security Council's intent was to have "an immediate ceasefire in Libya, including an end to the current attacks against civilians, which it said might constitute 'crimes against humanity' ... [imposing] a ban on all flights in the country's airspace — a no-fly zone — and tightened sanctions on the Muammar Gaddafi regime and its supporters."^[20]

“美/叙战争”:

Syria 内战在先，各国都卷入了。On 22 September 2014, the United States officially intervened in the Syrian civil war with the objective of fighting the Islamic State as part of Operation Inherent Resolve in the international war against the Islamic State.

第二次海湾美伊拉克战争:

是第一次海湾战争的延续。

(#15753601@0)
Last Updated: 2023-11-3

肉脸上如何判断谁是坏人？先攻击的？ -sammywang(地主管家); 2023-11-3 (#15753532@0)

那些首先骂我的女童鞋们，肯定不是。 -wandanla(s); 2023-11-3 (#15753543@0) +1

挺好，这次野猪同学主动承担部分责任 -sammywang(地主管家); 2023-11-3 (#15753587@0)

哪里哪里，女童鞋们哪里有任何责任 -wandanla(s); 2023-11-3 (#15753631@0)

那是因为家里老公照顾不周！ -torontohouse2012(torontohouse2012); 2023-11-3 (#15753767@0)

女同学们什么时候骂过你？明明是长发的男同学们！ -torontohouse2012(torontohouse2012); 2023-11-3 (#15753763@0) +1

这位童鞋，id 背后的性别鉴定还是你拿手。 -wandanla(s); 2023-11-3 (#15753773@0)

第一个没听说过，至少你要提供来源吧。但是代尔亚辛村大屠杀可是历史有记载的锡安主义屠杀阿拉伯人，几周后就爆发了第一次以阿战争。第一个就不靠谱，后面就没啥信誉可谈了。你再了解下2021年巴以冲突是谁导致的，就知道你这个说法有多不靠谱，先找靶子再射箭有些可笑 -m0ba(莫⑧); 2023-11-3 (#15753536@0)

In November 1947, the United Nations General Assembly passed Resolution 181, partitioning the land into “Independent Arab and Jewish States.” The resolution met immediate Arab rejection. Palestinian militias attacked Jewish settlements. -**🥐; 2023-11-3 {698} (#15753559@0) +1

This history of Israel and Palestine is complicated. One land, two names. Those on each side claim the land as theirs, under their chosen name.

Full Story:
https://theconversation.com/the-history-of-israel-and-palestine-alternative-names-competing-claims-163156

为啥wiki竟然没有记录此事呢？第一次中东战争就发生在代尔亚辛村大屠杀之后，看出来谁更残忍了吧。而且前几天听说犹太人不承认联合国了，这个181是不是就不合法了？土地可以收回了吧 -m0ba(莫⑧); 2023-11-3 (#15753567@0)

wiki没有记录的多了。 -**🥐; 2023-11-3 (#15753602@0)

那说明就不是重要事情，相比大屠杀没有可比性，可以忽略不计了，放在这里没有说服力 -m0ba(莫⑧); 2023-11-3 (#15753616@0)

You probably didn't know that Wikipedia is an open platform where everyone can edit. -**🥐; 2023-11-3 (#15753669@0)

我当然知道，我还试图改过，不过很快就被改回来了，歪曲历史不是你想改就能改的，懂不懂？总而言之，wiki比你想象的要全，没有就说明不是著名历史事件 -m0ba(莫⑧); 2023-11-3 (#15753678@0)

我还试图改过，不过很快就被改回来了. Please tell us more about it. What did you change? -**🥐; 2023-11-3 (#15753697@0)

你自己去试试不就知道了，任何人都可以改，但不符合事实，很快就改回来，多简单的事还要不停问，太笨了 -m0ba(莫⑧); 2023-11-3 (#15753706@0)

The Deir Yassin massacre took place on April 9, 1948, when around 130 fighters from the Zionist paramilitary groups Irgun and Lehi … -anexplorer(页于); 2023-11-3 {46} (#15753717@0) +1
幸亏让你篡改的历史有人改正了。就是还不忘胡说。

哈哈哈，我想篡改的是国内历史，这个就是给你们个提示而已，不要想当然，不过揉脸想篡改历史的不在少数，看着就乐。 -m0ba(莫⑧); 2023-11-3 (#15753765@0)

脸皮真比城墙厚！ -anexplorer(页于); 2023-11-3 (#15753918@0) +2

好多著名的战争都让你给自动过滤了？美/越南战争，美/阿富汗战争，美/利比亚战争，美/叙战争，第二次海湾美伊拉克战争 etc 咋到处都是魅影啊！ -guanshui88(约定); 2023-11-3 (#15753550@0)

想多了, 就是X上一个转帖而已, 自己都不带改的. -killer(_); 2023-11-3 (#15753585@0)

连ZT都不要了，这样的小作文都是抄来抄去 -m0ba(莫⑧); 2023-11-3 (#15753593@0)

小圈子里面出来的东西, 还真以为是宇宙真理呢 :) -killer(_); 2023-11-3 (#15754364@0)

我一个个回答你 -uws(United We Stand); 2023-11-3 {3418} (#15753601@0)
美/越南战争:
北越首先进攻: Viet Cong initiated a war against South Vietnam.
美/阿富汗战争:
It's a result of the 9-11 attack.
“美/利比亚战争”:
On 19 March 2011, a multi-state NATO-led coalition began a military intervention in Libya to implement United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973 (UNSCR 1973), in response to events during the 2011 Libyan civil war. With ten votes in favour and five abstentions, the UN Security Council's intent was to have "an immediate ceasefire in Libya, including an end to the current attacks against civilians, which it said might constitute 'crimes against humanity' ... [imposing] a ban on all flights in the country's airspace — a no-fly zone — and tightened sanctions on the Muammar Gaddafi regime and its supporters."^[20]
“美/叙战争”:
Syria 内战在先，各国都卷入了。On 22 September 2014, the United States officially intervened in the Syrian civil war with the objective of fighting the Islamic State as part of Operation Inherent Resolve in the international war against the Islamic State.
第二次海湾美伊拉克战争:
是第一次海湾战争的延续。

北越首先进攻那个应该算是内战吧，怎么就让美国老大远跑来参战？阿富汗战争也是因为美国扶持本拉登，自己花钱给自己树立敌人，伊拉克更是如此，萨达姆成败都是美国人干得。叙利亚战争多方参战关键还是美俄代理战争，现在美国还在叙利亚偷石油呢 -m0ba(莫⑧); 2023-11-3 (#15753615@0)

你家被抢劫了，你打死了入侵者，谁是坏人？要是战争的对错这么简单就省事了，那美国可以确定是最坏的，因为他入侵最多国家，好坏是小孩子判断问题方法 -jackwan(Jack); 2023-11-3 (#15753681@0) +1

还是英国最坏，几百年前就开始殖民侵略了 -sammywang(地主管家); 2023-11-3 (#15754267@0)

应该是两牙, 但是英国人靠抢劫两牙起家, 而且是皇家特许抢劫. -killer(_); 2023-11-3 (#15754367@0)

美国不需要自己好，只要找地方宣传别人最坏就行，自己国内2党选举就一直这么干的。甘舔，人家不领情 -ly2010(豆角); 2023-11-3 (#15753715@0) +2

非常明显的逻辑错误，朝苏中进攻韩国，不能把帐算在所有中国人民的头上。照这么算，作为中国人的后代，大家都可以被韩国被列为报复对象。 -torontohouse2012(torontohouse2012); 2023-11-3 (#15753779@0)

恐怖主义逻辑就是，政府的错，平民要负责，楼主想表达无非是哈马斯的错，巴勒斯坦婴儿都该死 -jackwan(Jack); 2023-11-3 (#15753784@0)

在我看来，这场战争中支持哈马斯和支持以色列都是坏人 -jackwan(Jack); 2023-11-3 (#15753781@0)

没好人还是那句话成年人不分好坏只看利弊 -facenorthface(小北); 2023-11-3 (#15753786@0)

这样还能加精，侮辱大家智商 -m0ba(莫⑧); 2023-11-3 (#15753819@0) +2

我猜是踩对了版主的立场 -facenorthface(小北); 2023-11-3 (#15753880@0)

还有250那个帖子, 一看估计大概率就是转X的谣言, 一样上精华. -killer(_); 2023-11-3 (#15754365@0)

历史久远，弄清不易。坏的是那些东拉西扯，胡搅历史，对事件当事人做法是维护和平，还是破坏和平无法分清，逻辑之混乱就是个笑话 -x2y(xfer); 2023-11-3 (#15753850@0)

若不追究缘由和祸根，只是简单的以事件发生为标准，那是简单的黑白思维，是最容易被忽悠洗脑的思维模式...老爱仅以“好”与“坏”来作判断的基本上不是乌合之众就是智商低下...问：杨佳是好人坏人？ -see1see(Isee); 2023-11-3 (#15754283@0)

想判断好坏其实也挺烧脑的, 楼主简单定个标准, 这要是能判断出来对错来, 上帝都看不下去了. -killer(_); 2023-11-3 (#15754373@0)

估计版主也是类似的思维模式.... -see1see(Isee); 2023-11-3 (#15754380@0)

@Edmonton

我一个个回答你

Replies, comments and Discussions:

More Topics